Catalist home page |
Case studies |
Our team
Public Procurement - case studies
Working with a Regional Development Agency
We have been working with a Regional Development
Agency to identify appropriate structures for the
delivery of infrastructure improvements associated
with a proposed new community stadium.
We have advised on landlord and tenant issues, site
re-development matters, planning, construction,
joint ventures, taxation, state aid, public
procurement and contract law.
The Development Agency initially believed that the
best mechanism would be for all public sector
funding to be controlled by establishing a new
trust. However, from our discussions with them, it
quickly became clear that they were uncomfortable in
providing funding directly to the stadium developers
and wished to find alternative mechanisms for the
funding.
We have provided advice on trust and charity
legislation to confirm that the stadium developers
will not be eligible for charitable status as it is
only available to amateur sport because of recent
changes in legislation. We have also advised on
state aid issues which would arise if the grant
funding were to be provided to the stadium
developers.
We have advised the Development Agency on an
alternative mechanism for their public funding as
the infrastructure works to be funded by them can be
viewed independently from the stadium. This is
because the works have wider benefits, in
particular, to the educational bodies neighbouring
the stadium. We have suggested that the Agency’s
grant funding be directed through another interested
party, namely the City Council as this would be a
neat way for infrastructure works to be carried out
separately from, but in tandem with, the stadium
development. There are other advantages in following
this route, namely that local authorities have well
practised procurement regimes and the City Council
will be able to recover any shortfall for VAT on
their statutory functions. Therefore, our advice and
guidance to the Agency has not only resulted in a
clear route for the grant funding, it will prove to
be significantly more cost effective than
procurement through the stadium developers.
It has also been necessary to establish how the
Development Agency can incorporate controls so that
the stadium will be built on time and the community
aspirations of the stadium met. We have advised them
of a joint venture agreement structure whereby they,
the City Council and the stadium developers will
respectively agree to carry out their works
according to a certain timetable. As far as the use
of the stadium for community purpose is concerned,
we have advised on a leasing and covenant structure
which will ensure that these requirements are
delivered.
We have also advised on the construction elements of
the transaction, giving appropriate advice to
protect the Development Agency against cost
overruns.
Working with Bevan Brittan

